Saturday, March 31, 2012

Lion, Tigers, and Bears . . . and Deficits?--oh, my

As someone who knocked on doors and made phone calls and debated endlessly w/ Republican friends in person and via email for Barack Obama, to say that I’m disappointed in our President would be an understatement.

Republicans reading this, here is your candidate for 2012—Barack Obama.  No need to decide whether to vote for an alleged moderate in Mitt Romney or somebody a little more feisty in Rick Santorum or Newt Gingrich.  Pres. Obama has done more for your party than even GW Bush was able to accomplish in his eight years, mostly because Obama is willing to offer up cuts in Social Security, Medicare, and Medicaid— and I’m not even sure for what advantage other than to gain your favor in the voting booth in 2012.

Like many Democrats, I’ve been mystified by the seeming incompetence and/or weakness of this Administration as bad negotiators. Pres. Obama seemingly negotiates with fun-house mirrors—how else to explain that he could have raised the debt ceiling himself without any cuts three weeks ago per Sen. McConnell’s offer, or that just last week, House Speaker John Boehner offered up a plan that had the modest inclusion of a 15% increase in revenue coupled with an 85% cut in spending. Never mind all that, Obama and the others went all in—100% cuts; no increase in revenues.

Now, some of the Tea Party folk will applaud all this; in fact, roughly half of their caucus voted for this latest deal, which goes to show just how whacked of a plan it is. But the rest of us—those who want our kids to breath clean air; drink clean water; have their food inspected for contamination; go for a walk in a national or state park, without having to look at drill rigs; attend quality public schools where the student-teacher ratio is less than 50 to 1, which is likely to be the case in Cleveland this upcoming year; enough well-equipped and adequately trained police and fire fighters to ensure our safety; and roads that aren’t beaten to pieces by the hundreds of trucks that each prospective drill site will require—we want something more.  

We don’t want our Democratic President following Bush policies on extradition to secret prisons in other countries, warrant-less wire-tapping, endless detentions for American citizens (Pvt. Manning has been held for over a year without being charged with a crime), and the reckless continued cuts in government spending when the economy is already vulnerable. Again, we want something more. 

Well, the bad news for the Tea Party and the like-minded is that your taxes will go up, and they will go up disproportionately.  The sales tax is destined to increase and the wealthy will have succeeded yet again in shifting the tax burden downward, to us. 

And to those of you are now so distraught over the budget deficit, where were you during Reagan years when the size of government tripled? Or during the GW Bush years when government doubled in size?  Heck, even as recently as November of 2010, only 4% of those polled expressed any concern at all for the deficit.
But now we’re willing to knock out the knees of a wobbly economy, and place more
of the burden on the bent backs of the poor, aged and infirm — those who always
bear the brunt of these master plans schemed up by Republicans and, now we see,
even by some Democrats.

*this piece was first published in The Akron Beacon Journal and though it was prompted by events of late last summer, it's still relevant in the frustration many liberals feel w/ the current Administration



Friday, March 30, 2012

Liberal Media and Other Fallacies


To listen to some talk today, America’s “rugged individualism” has become those who have no compassion for their fellow man, hypothetically allowing a 30-year-old to die because he didn’t buy health insurance; they cheer at the number of executions in Rick Perry’s Texas; they boo a gay soldier who is serving our country in Iraq.

Is this what we’ve become—bitter, self-centered, and just downright mean? That’s not the America I know and studied in public school—it’s never been “every man for himself” in our America.  

But this dark, twisted vision of America is seeping into our daily lives.

While The Repository has done an admirable job in filling their opinion pages in the Sunday edition with left, right, and middle political opiners, they need to do a better job of offering equal time elsewhere. Dave Ramsey offers crotchety financial advice that makes clear his hard-right political leanings; Jim Hillibish, usually an enjoyable read, took recent occasion to sneer at educators and bemoan our tax rates, which, by the way, are at their lowest since Eisenhower. And Bruce Kauffmann, again, usually a pleasant, informative read, took his space recently to proclaim that FDR’s New Deal policies failed. Really? The millions of senior citizens who now live in dignity instead of poverty because of Social Security may beg to differ, Professor.

Of course, a privately-owned company can hire and give space to anyone they choose. But if their business is to report the news, serve the public good, and maintain credibility, then they do the public a disservice by offering only one-sided political perspective, especially outside of the opinion section tucked in places where it has no business being.  Come on, Rep, if we wanted that kind of stuff we can just turn on Fox News. 

*this piece originally appeared in The Canton Repository

Politicians Twist Facts, Water is Wet, and other Shocking Revelations


Thank you, Rep. I had been suffering from sleeplessness lately and your recent (Jan. 6) political fact check on Rep. Renacci’s voting has put my mind at ease. Who knew that rival political parties spun voting records to cast opponents in an unfavorable light?

Now that The Rep has set the record straight that the Congressman did indeed “vote for a bill to keep tax cut,” maybe in the interest of equal time The Rep can also clear up other unfortunate rumors regarding the other party, for example:

-President Obama hates America, puppies, and little kids (4 million additional children now receive healthcare through S-CHIP programs under the Obama Administration).
-With Ohio’s Richard Cordray being sworn in as the head of the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau just the other day, is it true that Pres. Obama is the first president to ever use recess appointments? (Wikipedia cites that Pres. Bush used recess appointments 171 times during his administration).
-Recent commercials assert that Sen. Sherrod Brown “voted to block American energy production and increase energy taxes” (such claims declared “mostly false” by politicfact.com).
-Has Pvt. Bradley Manning been tried yet for his role in Wikileaks? (last I heard, it’s been nearly two years and still no “fair and speedy trial” as guaranteed under our Constitution).
-Did Pres. Obama really sign the National Defense Authorization Act that would allow him and future presidents to hold indefinitely even U.S. citizens who are accused (not necessarily convicted) of terrorist activity?
 -Did Obama really assassinate a U.S. Citizen without due process as guaranteed in our Constitution? (In September, U.S. citizen and accused terrorist Anwar al-Aulaqi was in fact killed in an air-strike abroad on the orders of our President).

I wish the last three items weren’t true, but I include them because even as a Democrat I expect better of our President; we should all expect more from our politicians and our news media, entities who fail us when they pick sides and serve interests other than those of the “publick good.” 

*a version of this piece previously appeared in The Canton Repository

Welcome to the Boomtown . . . really?


Most readers have bought a car from a dealership at some point in their lives. As you know, one of the keys is to get you, the buyer, to buy now: “What’s it gonna take to put you behind the wheel?” 

Why the rush? Well, as we know, it’s so that you can’t change your mind; it’s so that you don’t have time to gather more information.  You just might find a better deal down the road or talk to a mechanic who informs you that Ford Pintos don’t make great second-hand cars.

It reminds me a bit of fracking (some prefer “hydraulic fracturing” when describing the drilling technique). With even the mayor so giddy that he wants to rename Canton the “Utica Capital,” and several local leaders, including an official in Salem, declaring they want their burgh to become a “boomtown” (these folks should probably review what a boomtown actually is—hint: it’s not good), it’s tough not to get swept up in the rush.

But just a few sticking points:

-after partnering with Chesapeake Energy, a French company now is part owner of the majority of leases here in Ohio
-the gas/oil extracted from Ohio doesn’t stay here; it goes onto the global market.
-the industry announced, quite surprisingly, they were cutting gas production in order to keep prices from falling too far(?!)
-according to an official in Carroll Co, “There is no extra money coming into the townships or the counties to handle the extra costs we are seeing.”
-the Ohio Department of Natural Resources, in another surprise, found the deep injection wells in Youngstown were, in fact, “inducing” the dozen or so earthquakes recently felt there.

So, I know it’s just going to be fantastic, but tell us again why we have to buy this lemon? 

*a version of this piece appeared in The Canton Repository 

Obama=Nixon (wtf?!)

http://www.thefiscaltimes.com/Columns/2011/07/22/Barack-Obama-The-Democrats-Richard-Nixon.aspx#page1

*not sure if the President's liberal apologists or the Birthers get more fired up by this piece--definitely worth a read.

Are Unions Still Relevant Today?


According to economist Paul Krugman, today’s wealth disparity hasn’t been seen since the days of the “robber barons,” who were flourishing as America celebrated its first Labor Day in 1894.  

Peruse a recent Repository:

-pollution limits for drilling but not fracking
-Kasich seeks to privatize the lottery and turnpike, as done with some prisons and the liquor agency
-Sec. of State attempting to ban Cuyahoga Co. from mailing ballots to registered voters
-Team NEO/JobsOhio excited about business recruitment

What do these news items have in common? They are evidence of practices that benefit the few, often at the expense and detriment of the many. How does not having pollution limits on fracking help us? What’s the benefit to the state in privatizing lottery profits?  Why should we disenfranchise voters in one county just because we’re disenfranchising them in others? And please tell me why Team NEO/JobsOhio, who simply tell corporations “come and get it!” can siphon off millions of our tax dollars for themselves—with little to no “sunshine”? Again, these all benefit the elite few at the expense of the majority.

It’s no coincidence that that the wealth gap has widened over the last 30 years as some have sought to chip away at the very things that benefit most of us, things like access to higher education and affordable healthcare, a fair wage, and safe food and clean water. Unions are one of the few things left between us and today’s robber barons.

Like many of you, my family is stretching its dollars at the grocery store, and, of course, we want the butcher’s thumb off the scale when we buy our groundchuck. And we should expect the same from our newspapers when it comes to unionism. Are unions relevant today? Lord help us if they’re not.

*a version of this piece appeared in The Canton Repository in response to the question: "Are unions still relevant today?"

Ohio Must Aspire to More Than Austerity

Special to The Repository

About a year ago, a local video store had placed on its marquee: Wanted Manager $38,500 to start. In many Ohio school districts, it would take a new teacher five or six years, while working on his or her virtually mandated master’s degree, to earn what that video store manager was going to make off the street.
This isn’t about criticizing those who rent movies to the public, but it is about what we value and how we show what is important.

TRADE-OFF
There has always seemed to be at least an implicit deal for public workers: You won’t get rich, but you’ll have good benefits. That always has been the trade-off. When I began teaching in 1996, I was paid $45 a day without any benefits, as a long-term substitute in a seventh-grade classroom. That position became full time the following year, and I was paid $24,000 with benefits. I was ecstatic. As the first college graduate in my family, I couldn’t believe that my hard work had gotten me to those lofty heights.

For 11 years (including summers), I taught, coached, supervised and advised my students at this Northeastern Ohio public school (some of my former students still drop me emails). My typical day began just after 4:30 a.m. I would read and respond to student work at a local diner until 6:30 or so, then head to school to start the official portion of my workday. On easy days, I would be home before 8 p.m.; a couple of times a week, I wouldn’t get home until 11 or later.

Again, this isn’t to complain — it was a life I chose, embraced and appreciated. Rather, it is about providing a glimpse into the life of an educator and others who choose to serve the public good, only to be attacked by the governor and members of the Legislature. The trust has been broken.

Now in my 15th year as a professional educator, with a graduate degree earned through the Ohio Rise Program, and having served a three-year term on the Educator Standards Board, I would like to think I’ve impacted lives positively. But what is going on now changes everything. Now, I’m being told that not only will I make less money, but also that this money will go to lesser benefits.

Why would — or better yet, how can I — stay in education? Will Senate Bill 5 help to draw more quality candidates into the profession? How can I remain in Ohio as an educator and raise my family? Above all, how does this help in the education of our students?

SHORTSIGHTED, PUNITIVE
Ten states don’t have teacher unions (essentially what we’ll have left if SB5 passes the General Assembly). Only one of these states ranks at least average academically; the other nine states rank in the bottom, according to “The Answer Sheet” in The Washington Post on Oct. 25, 2010.

Ohio must aspire to more than the proposed austerity measures.

I implore our senators to vote “no” on this extremely shortsighted and punitive piece of legislation that will do
more damage to Ohio than any possible good. Please urge your representatives by phone or email to do what is truly best in the long term for Ohio and its citizens.

originally posted Mar 26, 2011 @ 12:00 PM on CantonRep.com

Eric Eye teaches composition and English methods to teacher candidates at Ohio University in Athens. He lives in North Canton.
*I have since left OU but I really did enjoy their recent run in the Tournament. And while SB5 rightfully went down in flames in November, much of what I'm after in this piece still applies.